I'm sure this won't be a popular thing to say. My 10s of followers may in fact abandon me. But I'm going to say it. It's going to be political. IF you are one of the 5-10 who still come here, please read the whole thing before you decide spew forth teh hate.
More information is coming out of Fl about the, now famous, case of the neighborhood watch guy shooting the kid (trying not to trip too many search hits). I'll preface my opinion by saying it is absolutely tragic the kid was shot. I would not, under any circumstance want that on my conscious no matter how justified I may feel.
Should the guy have been following the kid? Maybe, maybe not. The guy was part of his neighborhood watch. Police encourage citizens to form neighborhood watches and patrol. What is the point of a NW if all you do is put up signs? So the guy sees the kid. He thinks the kid is suspicious. Was the guy profiling? You bet your ass. Should he? Sorry to say it, but probably. My Dad has had a real problem with crime in his neighborhood. Eventually they caught the kid responsible. He was a lone kid, wandering the neighborhood on foot, at night, wearing "street clothes". Yeah I'd probably call it in too. Perhaps the better choice would have been to simply call the police without ever leaving his car and let them deal with it. Do you really think the police would have come to investigate? I'm betting not. I can get the guy's action to a point. For sure his actions have put him in the position he's in now as public enemy number 1 (justified or not).
Let's talk about the kid for a second. Turns out he wasn't the angel after all. He was in trouble with his school for having a baggie with weed residue. There are now stories of tweets between he and a cousin of unprovoked violence against a bus driver. What was the kid doing there in the first place? Did he live there? It was a gated community.
According to transcripts the guy was following the kid while on the phone with the Police. They told him to quit. He said he returned to his vehicle. Then mayhem ensued.
The guy's story is he returned to his car and the kid jumped him. He was knocked to the ground, the kid repeatedly punched and slammed his head on the sidewalk. The kid grabbed for the gun. Fearing his life, he shot him.
Why the hell would the kid, much smaller than the guy, go after him? How could the kid knock him to the ground? How could the guy shoot a kid with only skittles and a drink in his hand?
Now we're hearing there is one, maybe 2 witnesses who did see the kid attack the guy. The guy had grass stains on his back, scrapes and cuts to his face and back of his head. The kid's girlfriend was on the phone with him and her story may support he attacked the guy.
The guy was clearly eager to do his job in the neighborhood watch. Maybe too eager. The kid was clearly no angel. Maybe the guy provoked the kid. Maybe the guy chased the kid and started a fight, ended up on the wrong side of an ass whooping and then used deadly force. Maybe he did walk away and the kid, pissed off at being followed with a history of bad choices, who decided to get some. Maybe the kid bum rushed the guy and caught him off guard. Maybe the guy was in fact just a fat geek with no history of violence completely unprepared to deal with 150 lbs of teenage gansta fury going off on him.
The media is doing a bang up job of inciting the populace into bounties against the guy, marches, protests, speeches on Capital Hill. Turning the guy into some crazed, racist vigilante with uncontrolled blood lust.
At the end of it all. A young kid is dead. The guy, no matter what the outcome will be the scourge of the earth. And no one really knows what the hell happened. Oh yeah, and the police have barely scratched the surface of the actual investigation. All of this is due to public outcry based on incomplete information.
Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if the guy did provoke the kid and shot him in cold blood. Nor would I be surprised if the kid did in fact beat the guy to the point where he feared his life. The circumstances leading up to the shooting are riddled with question marks from the guy's role in the watch to the kids motives and past. The stories (and they're just that at this point) of the actual shooting are suspect. Did witnesses really see anything (after all the source is the media)? What did the kid's girlfriend actually hear?
My point to this entire post is, NO ONE... and I mean NO ONE, not even the Justice Department knows what the hell actually happened at this point. For sure it is tragic. The only known is a kid is dead. Be patient. Let them investigate. Wait for all of the facts to come out. Then, and only then judge the incident.
Surgery Was Successful
5 years ago
